Larry McVoy wrote:
From: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Sourceforge CVS, was Re: [Dri-devel] radeon error

On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Jon Smirl wrote:

Having used CVS and BitKeeper, BitKeeper is way better.

I will just add a big "Amen, Brother!" to that.


Thanks, Linus.  We certainly try to make BK be a lot better than CVS
or anything else.  If it wasn't I'd expect more flames about that than
the license.

We may not be as polished as some Windows based whatever but BK is
a tool designed by engineers for engineers.  Our goal is to make you
more productive, as much as that sounds like marketing drivel.


Yes, BitKeeper has license issues, and some people won't touch it.


Over time we have a plan to make this go away.  The main reason that
there have been license issues is that we had a goal to give the latest
and greatest out for free, that's how we could help open source the most.
All the other companies give you an old buggy version or a stripped down
(no GUIs or whatever) version, etc.  We really wanted to give our best
out for free but that meant we had to protect our IP more than those
other companies.

We've heard that people would rather have better licensing terms than
more features so we've forked the tree and when the commercial version
is sufficiently ahead of the free version we'll revise the license to
be something that people like or at least can live with.

Speaking personally, that sounds great, especially if developers using the free & not-quite-so-free versions can work together seemlessly. Even a BK-lite seems like a big step forward from cvs.


Keith




------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to