On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 23:57, Jon Smirl wrote: > -- Michel Dnzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have been using both for a year and BK is simply much better than CVS.
I know bk is the best version control system in the universe feature-wise, no need to say it again. And again. And again. (And again) I still don't want to use it. Some proprietary OpenGL drivers are better in terms of features and performance as well, so why bother with the DRI (and Mesa, ...) at all? > I also admit, I use Redhat not Debian; I am not an absolute purist. That cliché again... > BK is saving me time and time equals money. CVS is not really free > because it is making me waste time. You're confusing free beer and free speech again. I'm mainly interested in the latter. > > > Several projects are trying to clone BK but none are close to being > > > complete. > > > > I'm pretty sure Subversion does at least what we need, and Xouvert is > > even using arch, though admittedly it remains to be seen how that works > > out. > > I'm rather hesitant about using DRI to debug Subversion; [...] My limited experience agrees with http://subversion.tigris.org/project_faq.html#stable; as you can see, a growing number of projects is using it already, even some kernel subprojects. I also agree we'd probably have to wait for 1.0 at least though. But I particularly agree with Keith that we can't likely drop CVS anytime soon. As an aside, some kernel hackers didn't mind being guinea pigs for debugging bk. No, I'm not thinking of Linus, way before that. PS: Thanks Keith for the wrap-up, sorry I still couldn't resist. ;) -- Earthling Michel Dänzer \ Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer Software libre enthusiast \ http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
