On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 02:17:19PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > On Maw, 2003-09-02 at 19:42, Jon Smirl wrote: > > There are 31 people with write access to dri.sf.net. The simplest solution > > would be for those 31 to switch to BitKeeper.
If thos 31 are OK with that then it's easy, we can do a BK to CVS exporter and the BK people are happy and the CVS people are happy. Before you reject that you might go look at the amount of information being captured in the CVS tree for the kernel. There are 12,911 commits in the CVS tree. That's because BK captures far more fine grained info than CVS does and we transfer that info to CVS. > Providing they don't have an employer or themselves work on anything > which forbids them using it (eg a version control system). I understand > why Larry says that but it is a problem. No it isn't. It's a problem if we choose to enforce it. Your employer uses BK and there are plenty of people at Red Hat who work on CVS and we haven't said a word. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
