On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 05:27:01PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote: > Ian Romanick wrote: > >Keith Whitwell wrote: > > > >>Ian Romanick wrote: > >> > >>>Who is building the binary snapshots these days?
I am. > >>>We need to start > >>>(and should have started a long time ago) including libGL.so in the > >>>snapshots. > >> > >> > >>Hmm, we've tried to ensure up until now that the drivers would work > >>with existing libGL.so's. What has changed to break this? > > > > > >The drivers work fine. It's the old libGL that's broken. It's supposed > >to export GLX_ARB_get_proc_address, and it doesn't. As a result, Wine > >assumes that it's not supported and applications have problems. The > >reason that I say we "should have started a long time ago" is that a lot > >of additional features are supported with a new libGL.so. > > > >I guess it depends on the purpose of the snapshots. If the purpose is > >*just* to get driver bug fixes out, then including libGL.so isn't > >necessary. If the purpose is to get bug fixes *and* new functionality > >out, then libGL.so should be included. > > > >I'm not doing the snapshots, so it's not really my call. :) > > I'm OK with distributing libGL.so under that rationale. Done. It will affect binary snapshots built from now onwards. Jose Fonseca ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
