The 2D driver supports all savage chips, but the 3D driver seems to only support the Prosavage and Twister (savage4 core) integrated chips:
from savage_driver.c: if ((psav->Chipset == S3_TWISTER) || (psav->Chipset == S3_PROSAVAGE)) { /* Setup DRI after visuals have been established */ psav->directRenderingEnabled = SAVAGEDRIScreenInit(pScreen); } else psav->directRenderingEnabled = FALSE; I don't know how different the savage3D and savage4 cores are. There may also be some issues with shared vs. discrete video ram. Alex --- Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Actually the savage mx/ix chips are based on the old savage3D core, > > while the DRI driver is for savage4/prosavage cores. I don't know > how > > similar they are and whether the driver S3/VIA released will work > on > > the older savage3D based chips like the mx or ix. they might need > a > > separate driver much like the radeon r100 vs. r200. > > Alan Cox in a previous email said the savage driver from S3 was for: > Savage MX/IX/ SuperSavage/ ProSavage/ Twister/K > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel