On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 13:26, Alan Hourihane wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 01:05:14PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 12:56, Alan Hourihane wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 12:47:55PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 12:38, Alan Hourihane wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Log message: > > > > > update XFree86 tags & use X_BYTE_ORDER > > > > > > > > Why X_BYTE_ORDER? I thought the drivers were moving to Mesa in the long > > > > run. > > > > > > These are X's Imakefiles and pick up the config from xc/config/cf > > > > I know, but what's the point of defining X_BYTE_ORDER if the drivers > > aren't using it? > > Well, either it must have been used at some point, because the change > I'm making is going from. > > DRI_DEFINES = GlxDefines -DX_BYTE_ORDER=ByteOrder > > to: > > DRI_DEFINES = GlxDefines -DX_BYTE_ORDER=$(X_BYTE_ORDER) > > That's all. I'm not checking it's usage.
Ah, I thought you added the definition, should have checked. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer \ Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer Software libre enthusiast \ http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
