Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to  
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.     
    
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=717      
      




------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-20-09 12:45 -------
Created an attachment (id=642)
 --> (http://bugs.xfree86.org/attachment.cgi?id=642&action=view)
XFree86.1.log (r128 DRI fails because tdfx is loaded)

> The mere fact that it remains loaded doesn't prevent anything.

On the contrary, when either of tdfx or r128 is not unloaded, DRI for the other
fails.

The attached log file from an X server started on the rage128 card while the
tdfx module was still loaded (from an earlier X server that was already
finished). Note that the r128 DRI fails.

The way out is to manually unload tdfx module and then restart X.

This also means that this is not really r128 specific but generic to the way
the kernel DRM handles this stuff.      
      
--       
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.xfree86.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email      
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to