On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 06:37:29PM +0100, Dieter Nützel wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 10. Dezember 2003 15:12 schrieb Alan Hourihane: > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 02:46:27PM +0100, Dieter Nützel wrote: > > > Am Sonntag, 10. August 2003 9:39 schrieb Andreas Stenglein: > > > > trivial... > > > > fixes some typos in the radeon driver > > > > ["r100_sanity_typo_patch1.txt" (text/x-patch)] > > > > > > > > diff -ru HEAD_ORIG/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/radeon/radeon_maos_verts.c \ > > > > HEAD/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/radeon/radeon_maos_verts.c > > > > --- HEAD_ORIG/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/radeon/radeon_maos_verts.c Wed Apr > > > > 30 > > > > > > 03:50:52 \ > > > > > > > 2003 > > > > +++ HEAD/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/radeon/radeon_maos_verts.c Sun Aug > > > > 10 > > > > > > 11:10:27 2003 > > > > > > > @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ > > > > RADEON_CP_VC_FRMT_ST0| \ > > > > RADEON_CP_VC_FRMT_ST1| \ > > > > RADEON_CP_VC_FRMT_N0) > > > > -#define TAG(x) x##_rgpa_spec_st_st_n > > > > +#define TAG(x) x##_rgba_spec_st_st_n > > > > #include "radeon_maos_vbtmp.h" > > > > > > [-] > > > > > > It "applies" on radeon _and_ r200. > > > Is this _needed_? > > > I have rediffed it against trunk (radeon and r200). > > > > It's not strictly a problem - more of a typo. > > > > I've just committed it. > > Did you cover all this?
In your original email I didn't see any patches. > Maybe "radeon_sanity.c.diff" is wrong? I don't think so, and just committed it. Alan. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id78&alloc_id371&op=click -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
