The rework of of the dri drivers that I am doing is also dependent on parallel changes being made in the DRM drivers. I'd like to have them in the same cvs system so that I can keep things in sync. What the point of keeping them in the DRI tree if the only client of them now lives in the Mesa tree?
We'd like to feel comfortable enough with the versioning mechanisms in place in the dri and drm that they can live in seperate trees. Your drivers should be able to figure out at runtime whether the drm has is new enough and either cope or exit with an error message. New drms must always work with old clients.
Keith
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
