On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 05:30:57PM +0100, Felix Kühling wrote: > On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:55:55 +0000 > Alan Hourihane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Felix, > > > > How about dropping your current DRI savage driver into the Mesa trunk (6.1) > > and whipping the driver into shape with the current DRI trunk. > > Are you suggesting to continue development on DRI trunk or make a new > branch from the current DRI trunk? The latter is what just happened with > mach64. I'd do the same with savage. Either way, seeing as the driver would be in the Mesa trunk, DRI branches don't seem to make much sense anymore to me, unless it's for work on GLX like the work Ian's doing.
The whole point of DRI branches before was to isolate new driver work, but the Mesa trunk works in the opposite direction - i.e. new work being on the trunk. > > I think that will serve you best, in that Mesa 5.x is obviously being > > left behind now, and if you hit problems they may be bugs in 5.x your > > hitting. > > > > I'm going to bring my T20 up-to-speed to see if I can help with this > > at some point, but it'd be good to get it into the Mesa 6 trunk code first. > > Ok. That's fine with me. If Brian agrees I could make the move over the > weekend. O.k. But I doubt Brian would disagree. Alan. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id56&alloc_id438&op=click -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
