Michel DÃnzer wrote:
Thanks again for your work on this Dave.
BTW, what's your (and everyone's, for that matter) opinion on video-reset and the libsysfs copy being in the drm module? I still don't see the point of the former being there, much less the latter.
I agree with Dave. libsysfs should get the axe, but video-reset can stay or go. I do think that libdrm should get moved to the drm tree. That will probably require move invasive changes to the build process, though.
When you say libdrm, I think of something tied to XFree86 & its module system in some basic way - if that was the case I'd object. But I'm betting you're suggesting putting a nice clean userspace library for the various drm kernel modules in the drm tree, which makes a lot of sense. Maybe the libdrm inside XFree86 already fits that description?
Keith
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id70&alloc_id638&op=click -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
