On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 01:53:40 +0200
Michel D�nzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 16:19, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > Michel D�nzer wrote:
> > > Does anything speak against repo-moving Makefile.{bsd,linux} to
> > > Makefile?
> >
> > I can't think of any reason not to.
>
> Turns out a simple repo-move doesn't work for Makefile.linux as it
> contains some Makefile juggling hacks. The attached diff shows the
> difference between Makefile.linux and the new Makefile which I'm going
> to commit soon, unless someone objects.
>
> Given this, I'm leaving Makefile.bsd to someone who can test it.
>
> Also, should I try to fix up the snapshot scripts, or leave that to the
> people dealing with the snapshots?
If you don't do it I'll take a look at it when I finish the snapshot
split (probably tomorrow). It should be as simple as changing the
install script to use Makefile.linux if available and Makefile
otherwise.
Felix
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id70&alloc_id638&op=click
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
