On Thursday 13 May 2004 15:50, Felix K�hling wrote: > AFAIR it was decided to disable the SF bugtracker in favour of the > XFree86 bugzilla. It just turned out that there was no way to really > disable it. Project admins, correct me if I'm wrong. > > Now that DRI seems to become interesting to more projects than XFree86 > it may be a good idea though, to have its own bug tracker somewhere. > Maybe you can bring this up again at the IRC meeting next monday. It is > important to have a (non-silent) consensus among the developers who are > supposed to fix those bugs in the end.
Which is why I suggested freedesktop for bugzilla service, since we're already hosted there for CVS. The response I've heard on IRC has been positive but small, for whatever that's worth. > Another possibility would be to track DRI bugs in the Mesa bug tracker > as DRI drivers become more integrated into the Mesa build system. Do you > think you could talk Mesa developers into using a Bugzilla? AFAICT Brian > takes care of most Mesa bugs, so his vote would count most. (cc'ing mesa3d-dev@) That's not a bad idea. The product would then be Mesa and DRI would be a component. Brian? Other Mesa devs? - ajax ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id%62&alloc_ida84&op=click -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
