--- Thomas Hellstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> It will be great to be able to build the 3d drivers in Mesa!!
>
> I was about to post a patch that enabled the building of the
> unichrome_dri.so as via_dri.so in the xc tree, but
> hopefully this will not be necessary.
>
> Here is were the problem starts. All X side drivers are expecting the
>
> name via_dri.so instead of unichrome_dri.so, and while I agree that
> the
> latter is more representative for what it really is, it causes
> problems.
> Perhaps a separate makefile is in place, or maybe a makefile option?
Since 3D support for via chipsets is not yet part of any standard
distro or windowing system release, I think you can probably call it
anything you want. If unichrome_dri.so is a better name, then change
the DDX to expect unichrome or vice versa. then just send a patch to
proper upstream groups. There's no real "maintainer" of the via
driver, so you guys are probably it.
Alex
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> /Thomas
>
>
>
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
