On Fri, 2004-07-16 at 06:06, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 08:22:42 +0100 (IST), Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Is the i830 driver considered to be dead, should any future work go > > towards the i915 one? > > > > just like to get a semi-official idea? if so we need to import the up to > > date DDX into the DRI tree and start releasing the snapshots for the i915 > > driver.. > > Sounds good to me. At this point perhaps we should just not worry > about updating the DRI tree and just switch to using the XORG tree for > DDX. it's a lot of hassle to have to maintain both trees and then > moves changes back and forth. New dri DDX related work can happen on > a branch maybe. Just a thought... > > Alex
There would certainly be access for all current DRI developers to the XOrg tree, at least from our end. I remember there were concerns with idr being able to commit to the new tree due to IBM policy, though. Any updates on that? -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
