On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 00:47, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 03:21, Eric Anholt wrote: > > OK, so current DRI sources have been merged. Sorry for the CVS logs not > > being clear on the mailing list, but what happened was that after I > > noticed that the Mesa log was huge I went and turned off logging until > > after the conflict resolution. Probably should have turned it back on > > before conflict resolution. On a related note, I feel like CVSROOT > > modifications should also go to the mailing list, so people can know, > > "OK, anholt's playing around with big imports and things will have > > changed." Any opposition to doing so? > > I'd rather also see huge logs. But that's just me.
I'm really mixed about that. It's somewhat nice for those of use with nice connections, but I even now I'm not a fan of getting > 100K mails for no reason. Most of that Mesa log is a bunch of uninformative "U"s. However, that could be decreased significantly if I stopped doing something bad in the Mesa import. Right now I just import a whole Mesa tree, while the build doesn't need the progs, GLU, glut, etc. I should figure out how to properly remove the existing files (cvs rm from the vendor branch, I'm thinking), and add that list of files to remove to the top of the Mesa tree so that it can be used in the importing pseudo-script I've got. Doing that will be more of an improvement to bandwidth/space usage than all the log avoidance we could ever do. -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
