On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 01:39:20PM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
> Jon Smirl wrote:
>
> >Do we really need the DRM() macro around function names? With Linux the
> >only exported symbols are the ones marked with EXPORT_SYMBOL. Is this a
> >work around for another OS to stop symbol conflicts when the OS exports
> >all symbols?
>
> Is that even the case if multiple DRM drivers are built into the kernel?
Functions that is not exported shall be declared static.
static seems not to be overused ATM...
Sam
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
