drm/linux is GPL licensed.
This just isn't true. What on earth makes you think this? Read the license before you make these sorts of comments, you dweeb. There shouldn't be any GPL code in there at all.
I think you mis-read Keith, he said about converting it in the future to that form. I'm as I said against the GPL'ing of any of this at this stage, we have all the info we need in X DDXes they are all usually X licensed so I don't for see issues with ripping the code from them..
OK, it's a proposal rather than a statement. Apologies in that case.
Let me be clear that I am unwilling to support changes to the DRM that break it's usability on other operating systems on principle.
Maybe it's time to consider a fork of the DRM to allow a major experimentation of the form Jon envisages to proceed without worrying about boring constraints like keeping BSD working, backwards compatibility, etc. And the current DRM architecture, which is pretty much stabilized, can continue to do those boring tasks, and accumulate new drivers, until GNULonghorn is finished...
Keith
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
