On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:28:45 +0200, Nicolai Haehnle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 28 September 2004 15:02, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Nicolai Haehnle wrote: Hi Nicolai, you can just rename the driver so it produces r300_dri.so - the 2d driver is in fact configured to tell DRI clients to use that binary.
Well, it does produce r300_dri.so right now. The reason I am doing the work in an r300/ subdirectory is that development is going on in a different CVS repository, and I really don't fancy worrying about complicated merges with Mesa CVS (across file renames, at that!). Or maybe I somehow misunderstood what you meant?
I think Nicolai has proven his competence as a coder, I think it'd be ok to give him mesa cvs access. it might be easier to develop in mesa cvs to keep synced up and such. Thoughts? I suppose you might want to wait till 6.2 is tagged.
Fine by me. Daniel Stone can set you up with CVS-write permission. Just don't mess up the core/trunk code this week.
-Brian
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
