On Thursday 28 October 2004 20:11, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> - 0x2284. This one is interesting. The script gives this the name 
> "X_VAP_PVS_WAITIDLE", the driver always emits this right before 
> R200_SE_VAP_CNTL. Apparently it exists on r200 too. Looks like it forces 
> the VAP (whatever that stands for...) to wait. Would we need to emit 
> that too?

The guessed register name is from me. On the R300, fglrx almost always 
writes 0 to this register before changing any vertex processor-related 
state, so I assume that it has some kind of serialising purpose. However, I 
have yet to run into any situation where emitting it makes any difference 
in my own code, so I don't know this for sure.

cu,
Nicolai

Attachment: pgp0GdyzVtEM4.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to