On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 22:03:56 -0500, Adam Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If we proceed down the X on > > GL path this problem would go away since X would stop using libdrm. > > No, it won't. For X on GL, the server still loads a DRI driver. It's just > already loaded early during eglCreateContext or whatever, rather than loaded > explicitly by libglx. The server still needs to be a window system for the > 5000 GLX applications that already exist, and we'll still want to be able to > do accelerated indirect GLX.
I meant that X on GL would stop directly using libdrm, the server process would still use it indirectly via the dri.so's. -- Jon Smirl [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
