On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 22:07 +0000, Dave Airlie wrote: > > > > After think a little and put dri working with kernel 2.4. > > The only solution, that I see, to not private users of savage with > > kernel 2.4, have dri. Is do 2 directory on Xorg tree, one with the code > > before 2005-01-01 and other for kernel 2.6 > > Not really a good idea, the old code was not releaseable or secure, 2.4 is > a fixes only tree, why do people want new drivers for it? if you are > running production machines on it you won't want a dodgy DRM driver on > it... > > you can always use CVS to checkout the old code... > > Dave.
Ok I accept that, about releaseable and dodgy DRM drive, I agree. but just a tough, about security, nowadays it common say, errors are security problems, I don't see how could drm be insecure. -- Sérgio M.B. ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
