> > The env var still has the R200 prefix, otherwise it seems fine. > However, is this actually useful? IMHO, this is just dead code which will > never get used normally. At least I don't know any single app which would use > the extension - they definitely prefer things like ARB_vertex_array_object... > IIRC this was specifically implemented for a single customer for the r200 > driver, so unless this customer wants to use other graphic cards, I can't see > how this would be really useful in other drivers. > Just my opinion, of course ;-).
Well for my day job application we are using a Radeon 7500 and I would like to use the client side storage in it, so I was adding it to the radeon driver internally I said I may as well submit it in case it might be useful..... I'm still not 100% sure it will help my work application but I ported it to see if it could.... and it was quite trivial... (will fix the env variable...) Dave. -- David Airlie, Software Engineer http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied / airlied at skynet.ie pam_smb / Linux DECstation / Linux VAX / ILUG person ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
