FYI,
Apparently, even though the DRM_SOURCE_PATH variable is set, it's not getting checked. If I copy the r300_driver/drm directory to the same directory as the Mesa source tree, the r300_dri.so library gets built fine.
Now to test it :-)
Adam
Well, when I went to load the kernel module I compiled from the <r300_driver>/drm directory, I get this:
radeon: Unknown symbol drm_open radeon: Unknown symbol drm_fasync radeon: Unknown symbol drm_poll radeon: Unknown symbol drm_core_get_reg_ofs radeon: Unknown symbol drm_irq_uninstall radeon: Unknown symbol drm_get_dev radeon: Unknown symbol drm_ioctl radeon: Unknown symbol drm_exit radeon: Unknown symbol drm_debug radeon: Unknown symbol drm_core_get_map_ofs radeon: Unknown symbol drm_init radeon: Unknown symbol drm_vbl_send_signals radeon: Unknown symbol drm_cleanup_pci radeon: Unknown symbol drm_mmap radeon: Unknown symbol drm_order radeon: Unknown symbol drm_initmap radeon: Unknown symbol drm_core_reclaim_buffers radeon: Unknown symbol drm_release
So what am I doing wrong this time? :-)
Adam
------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
