Did you get latest CVS x.org source with support for r300 ? Or did you
patch it with ati.patch from r300_driver ?
D. Hageman wrote:
<
I just got done with the second try at this. I pulled the Mesa and
r300_driver cvs trees this morning and recompiled. The only hitch was
that apparently some changes have happened to the radeon and r200
driver in the Mesa tree that doesn't allow it to compile. Looks like
someone added some code with some defines that didn't get into the
header.
At any rate, still the same situation with the glxgears. It works,
but it works slow. I don't get any lockups. I think the r300_demo is
working fine. Enabling the LIBGL_DEBUG doesn't show that it isn't
finding anything like r300_dri.so or something.
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
