On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 15:42 -0500, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 22:08 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > > > I don't see the current system slowly evolving into some superb future > > system with an in kernel memory manager. The current APIs just have too > > many limitations. I think the memory manager must be the foundation of > > everything and after it's in place the fbdev API should be able to use it. > > The only change to simple fbdev apps would be that they can't get access > > to any offscreen memory as they do now. Something like DirectFB would need > > to change to accomodate the new system but I don't see that as a problem. > > I agree on this.
Ok, ok, I'll do crap since that's what everybody wants. Ben. ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
