On 6/16/05, Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And to be honest this is "bollocks" I don't want to quote private mails
> here, but neither myself or benh said anything of the sort from my
> reading, we just a) didn't like your Xegl is the *ONLY* way forward
> approach and b) your approach stomped on any chance that older apps (and
> DirectFB) would continue working... we both stated we see a three-tier
> approach to merged drivers being the way forward, and I'm going to start
> adding hooks to CVS, just because we aren't willing to jump in and apply
> patches straight away might speak more about how we are "maintainers" and
> not "break everything in sighters to add a new feature.."

Three tiers is fine with me and I've never been against it. But we've
only been talking about this for two years now and no one has stepped
up to fix 67 fbdev drivers - I'm sure not going to it. I don't want to
wait another two years to build Xegl so I'm trying to come up with
some way around the problems.

-- 
Jon Smirl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id492&op=click
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to