On 8/25/05, Aapo Tahkola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 16:19:19 +0200
> Roland Scheidegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Aapo Tahkola wrote:
> > > That check doesnt currently seem to work because some setup(at
> > > preinit) with color tiling enabled will get done earlier.
> > >
> > > Does this version break r200s or radeons?
> >  From the top of my head, I think it does. For certain 16bit resolutions,
> > that is (as the resolution won't be a multiple of 2048 bits wide, which
> > is the block width of those chips for color tiling - i.e. 64 pixels for
> > 32bit, 128 pixels for 16bit). That said, I think the use of
> > info->MaxSurfaceWidth doesn't make any sense there, it is pure
> > coincidence that "2048" is the same (in pixels) for the max width as it
> > is (in bits) for the pitch increment. Isn't the block width of the r300
> > based chips 2048 bits too?
> 
> It seems to be.
> 

Should be fixed in cvs.

Alex

> --
> Aapo Tahkola
> 
>


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to