Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to    
       
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.     
   
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5366          
     




------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-12-18 04:27 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> It's been quite a while since I looked at r300, but I suspect that the routing
> of data between vtx and frag programs still isn't quite right.
> 
> Do you also see a speedup if you modify r300_state.c::r300_setup_rs_unit to
> route col0 into a fragment program register, even if it isn't read?
> 
> You'll also have to modify r300_fragprog.c::init_program to assume that col0
> exists so that the fragment program reads the correct registers.

I cannot really do that. R300_RS_ROUTE_0_COLOR is actually vp result register
number. Although this starts at zero, its assigned at 
vof(R300_RS_ROUTE_0_COLOR).

AFAIK, passing undefined values to interpolators is also illegal and will lock
the GPU.          
     
     
--           
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email         
     
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to