Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5413
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-12-29 12:07 -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> I'm a bit worried about adding all IDs from the DDX to the DRM/Mesa as the 3D
> isn't reported stable on all the combinations especially with 64-bit things...
>
> I'd prefer to add them on a it works for me basis, and even that isn't
> probably
> that great.. maybe we shouldn't be enabling DRI on r300 by default...
The point of the patch isn't so much about adding ids only, but to make it more
conistent too. It's a bit messy currently with the 3 distinct sets of ids of
ddx, drm and dri (though it makes sense if ddx supports a superset). Also, I'm
not sure I agree about "adding 1 by 1", with 133 (in ddx) devices you're bound
to have some which are very rare (for instance some firegl cards). Personally I
think all chips from a family should be added or not, except probably some
"special" ones (very few of these exist afaik, like the multi-chip rv280). There
is absolutely no reason some X600 card is listed there but some other (maybe
X600Pro) is not imho (though you might want to enable or not based on the
interface, i.e. agp or pci-e too).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
