Benjamin Herrenschmidt [2006-02-13 09:20]: > On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 19:25 +0100, Tilman Sauerbeck wrote: > > Tilman Sauerbeck [2006-02-12 13:39]: > > > Benjamin Herrenschmidt [2006-02-10 18:12]: > > > > Here's a 3rd set of patches. Please report regressions ASAP as I intend > > > > to merge those in the various CVS trees real soon now. > > > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > Also, I fixed a potential issue in the DRM with machines where AGP > > > > writeback doesn't work (we would still rely on AGP writeback for the > > > > ring read ptr instead of reading it from a register). > > > > > > I believe these 2 patches introduce a hardware lockup problem in 3D > > > mode for me. It's not reliably reproduced though, so I'm not sure > > > > n/m, I just reproduced it with patch set #2, so it's not a regression. > > What if you only apply the X patch and not the DRM patch ?
Current DRM CVS HEAD doesn't work for me. However it does work with a small patch applied: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5450#c3 Does it make sense to test that DRM code with the new X patch? Regards, Tilman -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
pgpaVumFHj6yo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
