> > It should probably be infinite if no hw lock is being held.
> > Lock should be dropped in case of longer waits so that user is given a 
> > chance to stop the process.
> Well, the current behaviour (i.e. return EBUSY after 3 seconds) would 
> make sense too, the user-space driver could simply redo the ioctl (it 
> could also drop the lock before it retries). Which probably really is 
> what was intended, just that it checks for EAGAIN instead of EBUSY 
> (though the code does not drop and retake the lock) by mistake.

Dropping the lock while the card is busy processing commands ? sounds
pretty dangerous to me..

Ben.




-------------------------------------------------------
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in
the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to