Dave Airlie wrote:

>>Does anbody know why drm is using vmalloc_32 instead of vmalloc when
>>allocating SHM maps?
>>    
>>
>
>I may be wrong but maybe for mixed 64/32-bit kernel/userspace systems, did 
>it ever use vmalloc?
>
>  
>
Don't know really, but since drm AFAICT never cares about the physical 
address of the
underlying pages, vmalloc should probably do just fine, or even better 
vmalloc_user on newer kernels,
=> we could skip the memset() i just added.

/Thomas

>Dave.
>
>  
>


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to