Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 16:05 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > > >>So you can see why some sort of uncached+writecombined page cache >>would be useful, I could just allocate a bunch of pages at startup as >>uncached+writecombined, and allocate pixmaps from them and when I >>bind/free the pixmap I don't need the flush at all, now I'd really >>like this to be part of the VM so that under memory pressure it can >>just take the pages I've got in my cache back and after flushing turn >>them back into cached pages, the other option is for the DRM to do >>this on its own and penalise the whole system. > > > Can't you make these pages part of the regular VM by sticking them all > into an address_space. > > And for this reclaim behaviour you'd only need to set PG_private and > have a_ops->releasepage() dtrt.
I'd just suggest Dave just registers a shrinker to start with. You really want to be able to batch TLB flushes as well, which ->releasepage may not be so good at (you could add more machinery behind the releasepage to build batches and so on, but anyway, a shrinker might be the quickest way to get something working). -- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel