On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 12:24:54 +0100 "Kristian Høgsberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 27, 2007 1:48 AM, Jerome Glisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Side question of this what about fullscreen glapp, should their frontbuffer > > become the framebuffer ? My understanding being that each client got > > their private front&back(if double buffered) which is then blit to the > > framebuffer. I guess for fullscreen app we might want being able to give > > full gpu juice and avoid the blit btw the front and framebuffer. > > Only the back buffers are private, the front buffer is shared and > blitting to it is governed by the clip rects. So for a non-redirected > full-screen app, the X server framebuffer is the mesa front buffer. > Hey Kristian happy new year :), I was thinking about page flipping, i don't think page flipping fit well in this scheme. Maybe page flipping aren't worth the effort from performance point of view at least lastest bench on it show some minimal win. Cheers, Jerome Glisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
