On 2/28/08, Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Please don't let any api freezing depend on fedora core, at least give > > external parties time to play with it once it's reasonably stable, > > this will undoubtely reveal limitations. It should be in mainline drm > > well before api freezing it. > > > > > It's not called Fedora core any more :), but I won't be setting the > API in stone, I'll just be having people justify themselves for > changing it.. > > Who are these external parties you speak off? if they aren't involved > with X.org development then I don't really care... please try and play > with the API > now, you completely contradict yourself in that statement, how I can > it be reasonably stable if you expect it to be full of limitations?
Those external parties would refer to me. My original intention was to wait for a feature complete api (something in mainline drm), because i simply do not have the time to "play around" with it, nor is the porting a trivial effort. I would be surprised if everything was perfect from the start. > But in any case don't worry the API won't be frozen I'll deal with the > hit in Fedora... > > > Dave. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
