Xiang, Haihao wrote:
> Hi, thomas
>
> Many texture cases(see fd.o bug 
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14656, test case 
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=14547) with the following 
> usage model fail on 965 after merging with intel-post-reloc branch:
>
> 1. draw a primitive with a texture
> 2. map/unmap this texture image (which is used in the implementation of
> some GL apis such as glReadPixels, glTexImage2D in 965).
> 3. change some GL states and draw a primitive again. However this
> primitive is rendered with some unexpected color.
>
> In 965 driver, all BOs used for textures and texture surface states are
> created with LOCAL|CACHED|CACHED_MAPPED flag, the base address of a
> texture (buffer object offset) is written into the corresponding texture
> surface state (relocation entry).  
>
> After 1, the BOs for texture and texture surface state are bound into
> the GART with unsnooped PTEs. After 2, the texture BO is unbound, the
> texture surface state BO is still bound. At 3, the texture BO is bound
> to a new GART offset, and the relocation entry of the texture surface
> state BO is also updated in relocation process. Note that the texture
> surface state BO is bound with unsnooped PTEs. It seems that the GPU
> doesn't know the offset of the texture BO is changed. So I think an
> eviction is need before writing relocations which is added in DRM commit
> 638353103d009d44bd5bdbe97cc7cef1bf011cdf. However this fix is removed
> from DRM after merging with intel-post-reloc. 
>  
> Could you take a look?
>
> Thanks
> Haihao
>   
Haihao,
The intention with the intel-post-reloc branch was that the code-path 
for the mesa master drivers should remain completely unchanged compared 
to pre-merge, but apparently I missed that commit.

I'll have a look.

/Thomas




-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to