On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 9:02 PM, David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 10:46 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: >> Hi, >> >> So I've been growing more annoyed with the current layout of the drm >> tree in the kernel, >> >> a) it lives under char. >> b) everything in one directory. >> c) header files in one directory. >> d) no header files exposed to userspace. >> >> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/airlied/drm-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=7df9a948d0f849466e3de259cccb49bc54cbad68 >> >> is a proposal to create drivers/gpu/drm, (I may move AGP in there as >> well later). It also creates per-driver subdirs. > > Looks sane from the header export POV. Passes headers_check and doesn't > add any more instances of CONFIG_xxx visible to userspace (I'm coming > after those, soon). >
So assuming I fixed up the kbuild issues, any ideas on when it would be a good plan to upstream this sorta major movement. Not many DRM patches don't come via me, and I can fix up the ones that do before I merge them. Linus? any ideas on when you would prefer to take a tree like this? start of rc1? Dave. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
