> Quite frankly, I'm not going to take this. > > None of what you describe sounds like regressions, and this is just TOO > F*CKING LATE to take big changes like this, to a fragile subsystem that > has historically easily introduced new regressions. > > Can you please make a branch with ONLY REGRESSIONS, or fixes for major > problems that don't introduce several thousand lines of new code? > > Because you seem to be constantly unable to understand what "merge window" > means. And I'm not going to take this kind of crap.
I thought you might say that, I'll re-send with just the ones that fix the major issues, instead of ones that fix issues people wanted fixed. Most of the real bits were in Rawhide kernels for a few weeks, which tbh kicks the ass outta a linux-next/linux-mm test cycle. Your reply now serves as place to point people at when they ask why Red Hat/Fedora ships features that they can't get for 1-6 months, and I'm fine with that. Dave. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
