On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 10:15 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: > Ok; I messed with drmIoctl because I thought I remembered you saying we > shouldn't put the retry code there but rather in the individual ioctls that > needed it. We should probably do that separately anyway though if we ever > decide to.
That wasn't me; I'm all for additional levels of bullet-proofing when it comes to EINTR as it's hard to test all of the code paths. > +libdrm_la_LIBADD = -lrt I fear you'll need autoconf-fu for this? Otherwise, it looks like a reasonable plan. -- keith.pack...@intel.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It is the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Xq1LFB
-- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
