Hi David, I apoligize for overseeing that your patches were against dri-next. Indeed, by substituting "struct drm_local_map" with "struct drm_map" in file "drivers/gpu/drm/ati_pcigart.c" solved the problem.
Thanks! Kind Regards, Sedat On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 11:14 AM, David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> wrote: > From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.di...@googlemail.com> > Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 10:28:29 +0100 > >> unfortunately, your latest DRM patch [1] is broken while building >> against Linux-2.6.25-rc5. >> >> This is my patch-series: > > Did you read my patch postings? I said my work was relative > to dri-next, as sparc64 also needs the changes David has > commited there from Ben H. It therefore uses types only > found in that branch. > > In David's dri-next branch, the proper type is "struct drm_local_map", > so if you're not patching against his dri-next branch you won't have > Ben H's drm_addmap() changes which create and use that new type. > > You will notice that when David added my changes to his dri-fixes > branch, he corrected up that single line which you could have very > easily done as well. Just change "struct drm_local_map" to just plain > "struct drm_map". > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
