http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12419
------- Comment #7 from r...@sisk.pl 2009-02-25 14:54 ------- On Tuesday 24 February 2009, Wang Chen wrote: > Rafael J. Wysocki said the following on 2009-2-24 5:48: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > > (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12419 > > Subject : possible circular locking dependency on i915 dma > > Submitter : Wang Chen <wangc...@cn.fujitsu.com> > > Date : 2009-01-08 14:11 (47 days old) > > First-Bad-Commit: > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=546b0974c39657017407c86fe79811100b60700d > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123142399720125&w=4 > > > > not changed. > > ======================================================= > [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] > 2.6.29-rc6-default #165 > ------------------------------------------------------- > X/3940 is trying to acquire lock: > (&mm->mmap_sem){----}, at: [<c0168e97>] might_fault+0x42/0x7e > > but task is already holding lock: > (&dev->struct_mutex){--..}, at: [<eeb76fed>] i915_cmdbuffer+0xf4/0x411 [i915] > > which lock already depends on the new lock. > > > the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: > > -> #2 (&dev->struct_mutex){--..}: > [<c013791a>] validate_chain+0x8be/0xbb5 > [<c0138280>] __lock_acquire+0x66f/0x6f9 > [<c0138365>] lock_acquire+0x5b/0x77 > [<c02e56fe>] mutex_lock_nested+0xdb/0x244 > [<eeb5b03e>] drm_vm_open+0x25/0x37 [drm] > [<c011a8b3>] dup_mm+0x247/0x2f2 > [<c011b312>] copy_process+0x98c/0xfeb > [<c011bac7>] do_fork+0x120/0x29c > [<c01016be>] sys_clone+0x25/0x2a > [<c0102cdd>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x31 > [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff > > -> #1 (&mm->mmap_sem/1){--..}: > [<c013791a>] validate_chain+0x8be/0xbb5 > [<c0138280>] __lock_acquire+0x66f/0x6f9 > [<c0138365>] lock_acquire+0x5b/0x77 > [<c012e6f6>] down_write_nested+0x32/0x4f > [<c011a711>] dup_mm+0xa5/0x2f2 > [<c011b312>] copy_process+0x98c/0xfeb > [<c011bac7>] do_fork+0x120/0x29c > [<c01016be>] sys_clone+0x25/0x2a > [<c0102cdd>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x31 > [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff > > -> #0 (&mm->mmap_sem){----}: > [<c0137625>] validate_chain+0x5c9/0xbb5 > [<c0138280>] __lock_acquire+0x66f/0x6f9 > [<c0138365>] lock_acquire+0x5b/0x77 > [<c0168eb4>] might_fault+0x5f/0x7e > [<eeb76d0a>] i915_emit_box+0x1d/0x20c [i915] > [<eeb7705e>] i915_cmdbuffer+0x165/0x411 [i915] > [<eeb5685b>] drm_ioctl+0x1a6/0x21b [drm] > [<c0182b29>] vfs_ioctl+0x3d/0x50 > [<c0183029>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x41b/0x483 > [<c01830d1>] sys_ioctl+0x40/0x5a > [<c0102cdd>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x31 > [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
