On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:

> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_stub.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_stub.c
> >> index 096e2a3..7c8b15b 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_stub.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_stub.c
> >> @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ int drm_setmaster_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void 
> >> *data,
> >>        file_priv->minor->master != file_priv->master) {
> >>            mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> >>            file_priv->minor->master = drm_master_get(file_priv->master);
> >> -          mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> >> +          mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> >>    }
> >>  
> >>    return 0;
> > This is not a kind of patch that should be taken through trivial tree. 
> You must mean this is exactly that kind of a patch...
> Notice the double mutex_lock() on the same mutex in the same scope.

I try not to take urgent stuff through trivial tree, in order not to 
bother Linus more than once per merge window with trivial stuff.

I can of course take it, if DRM maintainers prefer it that way ...

-- 
Jiri Kosina

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to