Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:14:35AM +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote: > >>> First off, the non-staging patches need more complete changelog entries, >>> a bit of meaning goes a long way. I'll ack them if they are documented and >>> make sense. The unlocked ioctl hook makes sense to me at least! >>> >>> >> For the non-staging patches, (which also sit in the modesetting-newttm >> tree), I can add some more elaborate comments. However I think all of >> them are targeted to support functionality for TTM, so unless the TTM >> code goes into staging or mainstream, there is little point in merging >> them to core drm before other drivers find them useful. >> >> Although I see the patch adding TTM is including some backwards >> compatibility defines (In particular the PAT compat stuff) that needs >> to be stripped. >> > > Great, care to respin it and send it to me? > > thanks, > > greg k-h > Greg, A clean TTM patch was sent to Intel with the other patches. I'm not sure why it got lost along the way?
/Thomas ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
