Eric Anholt wrote: > On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 09:29 +0200, Jonas Bonn wrote: >> It looks like some code got left behind while generalizing. This patch >> removes the old, non-general version and fixes up the generalized version >> so that it does what its supposed to. > > NAK. > > There is SDVOB, and SDVOC. > > To detect SDVOB, you look in SDVOB. > > To detect SDVOC, you look in SDVOB on old hardware, and SDVOC on new > hardware. >
OK, I understand... now the comment in the code makes sense to me, too! I thought intel_sdvo_init was being called excessively, but the real problem would have been that of the other patch I mailed. Thanks for the clarification. /Jonas ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
