On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Keith Packard<kei...@keithp.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 11:37 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > >> Might be useful to bring up a shadowfb or noaccel X if the user is >> having accel problems, just to have a desktop. > > That's been the traditional answer, but at this point, NoAccel is a > completely separate path through our driver as it requires that the > framebuffer be mapped to userspace at driver startup time, rather than > only during unaccelerated operations. > > Which means that instead of being a reasonable 'fail over' plan, it > turns out to just be an additional source of bugs. In fact, noaccel has > never worked with KMS, and yet we've seen no reports of trouble...
How about having your accel prepare funcs return false when noaccel is set. Alex ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
