On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 08:31 -0700, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Thomas Schlichter <thomas.schlich...@web.de> wrote: > > > I don't think this is a good idea, Robert Hancock wrote there may be > > millions of such Laptops (Core Solo/Duo erratum AE7, Pentium M erratum > > Y31) : > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125537136105246&w=2 > > > > > or Perhaps just try to add mtrr only for the pci mmap case like the > > > 4th patch in this series.. > > > > I'd prefer this! ;-) > > Hm, we could perhaps do that - but i think we should only do that on > systems that have PAT disabled. > > Which brings up the question of how to properly QA such a narrow segment > of the market. Maybe disabling CONFIG_X86_PAT should enable that logic > too.
Also, I think we can simplify and avoid mtrr_add_unaligned() and worry only about the pci mmap aligned cases etc. Those are the only interesting ones. thanks, suresh ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
