On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 00:58, Alan Cox <a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote: >> But not only is Fedora not following the rules, > > You changed the rules. You require a Signed-off-by:. Fedora can no more > add a signed off by than you can. It's not their code nor Red Hat's code > any more than they "own" the kernel because they pay someone to work on > it. > >> See above. It's not you. It's Fedora. If Fedora hadn't merged Nouveau and >> shipped it, I wouldn't care. > > And zillions of Nvidia users would have been worse off. > > It's really simple: if you want to merge it *you* pull it and sign it off. > If you aren't prepared to do that then ask why Fedora should, its not > their code either. >
So what, if someone outside RedHat is ok to sign it off, it can go into staging? If it's that simple I don't mind signing it off (including the dubious bits), I can take the blame if that helps things move forward. Stephane ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Return on Information: Google Enterprise Search pays you back Get the facts. http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
