On Wednesday 12 May 2010 11:21:48 Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > Hi all, > > As the subject says, is this a know issue? I have been tracking the growth > at one second intervals and it looks like this: > > 512 (67716608) Slab: 606744 kB > 512 (67717120) Slab: 606752 kB > 512 (67717632) Slab: 606756 kB > 0 (67718144) Slab: 606756 kB > 512 (67718144) Slab: 606760 kB > 1024 (67718656) Slab: 606768 kB > 512 (67719680) Slab: 606772 kB > 512 (67720192) Slab: 606776 kB > 0 (67720704) Slab: 606776 kB > 512 (67720704) Slab: 606780 kB > > First fiels is the diff in numobj, in parentheses is actual numobj and last > is the total slab size from /proc/meminfo. > > kmalloc-8 68044800 68044800 8 512 1 : tunables 0 0 > 0 > > : slabdata 132900 132900 0 > > dm-io slab also seems large, don't know... : > dm_io 75924 147288 40 102 1 : tunables 0 0 0 > : slabdata 1444 1444 0 > > Some other info about the system/kernel is attached.
I think it is DRM (radeon) related, leak stopped when I closed all X programs. I am compiling 2.6.33.3 right now and will soon reboot into it. Tvrtko Sophos Plc, The Pentagon, Abingdon Science Park, Abingdon, OX14 3YP, United Kingdom. Company Reg No 2096520. VAT Reg No GB 348 3873 20. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
