Right. The difference in the two papers is that Dremel has an efficient encoding for a disk-resident dataset, whereas PowerDrill has an efficient encoding for a memory-resident dataset.
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 2:22 PM, karthik tunga <[email protected]>wrote: > If we assume the the data fits in memory, couldn't dremel do the same thing > ? > > On 5 September 2012 12:58, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Excellent idea. As Tomer indicates, with a flexible scan operator, this > > should be quite doable. > > > > On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Michael Hausenblas < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Yes it is easy. It indicates what you can do if you have stuff in > > memory > > > > and have a good index. > > > > > > Thanks, understood. However, I'd like to come back to my initial > message > > > and make a more explicit proposal: 'Include PowerDrill design and > > insights > > > as an input into our design'. > > > > > >
